According to the relevant laws, regulations, rules, and bidding documents for engineering construction, the evaluation of the construction of the fourth section of the Modern Agricultural Industrial Park High Quality Development Demonstration Park project has been completed, and the evaluation results have been determined. The evaluation results are now announced as follows: 1. Evaluation results: First candidate for the first bid, second candidate for the second bid, third candidate for the third bid. Bidder name: Jiangsu Kehong Geotechnical Engineering Co., Ltd., Zhongke Yongjian Construction Group Co., Ltd., Jiangsu Nongken Yancheng Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Bid price (yuan/rate) 2587615.642587711.642590261.20 Project leader name: Han Yilin, He Shiming, Chen Hongjun Bidder performance and awards (including project name and specific award situation)////Project leader performance and awards (including project name and specific award situation) Name, specific details of awards) 2023 Farmland Construction Project in Longyang District (Third Batch); The 2021 Huai'an District High Standard Farmland Construction Project (Sections 1-11) in Suzui, Yibiao; Construction Section 1 of High Standard Farmland Construction Project in Xindu Street, Xindu District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province in 2021; The third section of the 2020 high standard farmland construction project in Linquan County; Section 15 of the 2021 Huai'an District High Standard Farmland Construction Project; The second section of the 2020 financial subsidy high standard farmland construction project in Gugao Town, Jiangyan District, Taizhou City; Prequalification Status//2. Invalid Bid Documents Bidder Name and Judgment Basis Number Invalid Bid Documents Bidder Name Judgment Basis 1 Henan Pengzhi Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. did not provide the social security certificate for construction workers 2 Hengtai Water Conservancy Engineering Group Co., Ltd. did not provide the safety production assessment certificate for enterprise leaders (A certificate) 3 Guihong Construction Development Co., Ltd. did not provide the safety production assessment certificate for enterprise leaders (A certificate) 4 Zhejiang Wanli Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. did not provide the social security certificate for construction workers 5 Shandong Yuncheng Tianyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. The cover of the bid document was not stamped 6 Jinlong Water Conservancy Engineering (Henan) Co., Ltd. filled in the bid section name incorrectly 7 Hubei Yushui Engineering Construction Co., Ltd. did not provide the safety production assessment certificate for enterprise leaders (A certificate) Certificate: 8. Incorrect filling in the commitment letter of Maikuo Construction Co., Ltd. 3. Correction of bid price: None 4. Scoring situation of bidders: 5. Summary table of all bidders' scores: No. Bidder name Bid price (yuan/rate) Score situation Total score Quotation Project management organization personnel Project manager performance 1 Jiangsu Pengde Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. 2569508.689.572299.572 Anhui Dajiang Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. 2549241.295.11.75197.853 Anqiu Water Conservancy Construction and Installation Company 2566408.0795.52299.54 Dewei Construction Jiangsu Co., Ltd. 2567961.6695.542299.545 Fujian Xingzhou Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering Co., Ltd. 2550249.1795.1 32299.137 Gaochun County Zhenda Water Conservancy Construction and Installation Engineering Co., Ltd. 2571590.059